Profile


Since 1975, James has been the prime mover in the revival of Clumber spaniels as working gundogs – as advocate, writer, lecturer, breeder, trainer, shoot helper, gun and, in field trial competitions, handler and judge. He has gained field trial awards with many more Clumbers (ten) than any owner in the breed’s history. (more...)

Within the breed club (the Clumber Spaniel Club) in the early 1980s he arranged access for Clumbers to the BVA/GSDL hip scoring scheme, well before it was adopted by the Kennel Club, and endowed a research fund to offset the X-ray and submission fees faced by owners. Deeply concerned about large weight increases proposed by the Kennel Club in a revised breed standard (adopted in 1986), in 1982 he commissioned a paper (more...) from the leading canine geneticist Dr Malcolm Willis, senior lecturer in animal breeding and genetics at Newcastle University, in which he shared James’s opposition to the changes proposed, predicted adverse consequences, and called for a weight reduction rather than any increase. The Kennel Club went ahead with the increase anyway.

He co-founded the Working Clumber Spaniel Society in 1984 and was the main architect of its principles, positioning, communications and financial strength.

It was born from a need to fulfil a wholly different vision of the breed’s needs from that of the breed club, which was (and remains) substantially dedicated to exhibiting the dogs at shows. Its registration by the Kennel Club was achieved in the face of obstacles from within that body, influenced by the opposition of the breed club.

As secretary for 12 years, he led numerous new initiatives, from the re-establishment of minority spaniel breeds field trials and the creation of the society’s unique Breeding Commendation Scheme and Working Ability Assessments, through various designs of tests, matches and training events, to a successful recruitment campaign making first use of the Kennel Club’s computerised database. By satisfying a request from HRH The Princess Royal for a work-bred puppy, and later gaining her agreement to become the society’s president, he was responsible for the restoration of the breed to royal patronage which it had enjoyed under the Prince Consort and Kings Edward VII and George V. He conceived, wrote and published the society’s acclaimed brochure.

James believes that public awareness and education are essential to the attainment of the society’s goals, and in 1991 he received a major public relations industry award (IPR Sword of Excellence) for the high profile and recognition achieved for the society and the understanding for its mission.

While not intent on confrontation with those opposing the society’s mission, or those representing its interests too feebly, he has shown himself unafraid of controversy. He remains uncompromising in a commitment to further improvement of the Clumber spaniel as a sound and practical working gundog. Proud of the society’s record of real progress, he is upbeat about the breed’s future. With the dedicated support of his wife Christine (they married a month after taking on their first Clumber), James remains an active handler, working a team of up to five trained Clumbers on shoots, and an occasional breeder (more...) to maintain a pure working line now in its more than tenth generation.

From time to time James has enjoyed a change from Clumbers, and has trained, worked, trialled and bred cockers, gaining three field trial awards with a favourite bitch, and has trained and worked other breeds including English springer, German wirehaired pointer and large Munsterlander.

Milestones


1971 First encounter with Clumber spaniels: the gundogs tent at the CLA Game Fair at Stowe School: kept going back!

1975 First dog: a 15-month-old Clumber dog taken on trial for £30, renamed Bertie, June

1975 First use of a Clumber on game: Bertie used for driven grouse shooting, Scotland, September

1977 First field trial award: 4th and C of M, “minority breeds” stake, the Spaniel Club, north Wales

1978 First any variety spaniel field trial award: C of M, Essex FT Society novice stake: first award to a Clumber in a trial open to all other spaniels for 40 years

1978 First test win: an any variety spaniel open test, Leicestershire Gundog Society

1980 First litter: sire Bertie, dam Susie: 7 live pups, all going to working homes

1980 First limited edition print of a painting of Clumbers: “Clumber Spaniels and Pheasants”, produced and marketed by own publishing imprint, Venaticus Collection. It was fully sold

1981 Established Clumber Spaniel Research Fund within the breed club: endowed by proceeds of print sales, to fund research into hereditary conditions

1984 Co-founded the Working Clumber Spaniel Society: jointly with Shaun Freke; inaugural meeting of 70 members

1988 Revived the “minority breeds” field trial last held 1982, taking it over from the Spaniel Club, together with the solid silver trophy

1989 First use by any outside body of the Kennel Club’s registrations database, after much persuasion, doubling the WCSS’s membership

1990 First Clumber in royal family since 1937: sale of puppy, Edwina, to HRH the Princess Royal

1990 First win by a Clumber in a field trial open to any other spaniel since 1913: Duncan in the WCSS “minority breeds” stake, Suffolk

1990 Princess Royal accepted invitation to become WCSS president

1991 First placing in an any variety spaniel field trial since 1926: Duncan takes 4th in Meon Valley all-aged stake, Hampshire

1991 Duncan is highest-scoring spaniel in winning team of five gundog breeds at CLA Game Fair, Margam Park, south Wales, before an appreciative grandstand in 37° heat

1991 Received the Institute of Public Relations Sword of Excellence: major PR industry award for WCSS’s positioning and communications

1993 Gave presentation at 3rd International Seminar on the Clumber Spaniel, Sweden, on the WCSS’s role and achievements in improving health (more...)

1993 Returned to Sweden to judge field trial and lead training workshop

1994 First year when the WCSS represented the breed at the CLA Game Fair

1996 Retired as secretary of the WCSS

2001 Conceived, wrote and published the WCSS brochure

2002 Won 3-year battle over the KC’s failure to record field trials and awards for minority breed spaniels in the Stud Book – shown to be against its own rules (more...)

2003 Defeat in campaign to reverse the KC’s change of open stakes from any variety to ESS only, let down by feebleness of WCSS committee’s resolve

2004 Third field trial win by Max: gives him the top field trial record of any Clumber born in the 20th century

2004 Third Clumber of Venaticus kennel to win a field trial: Ros joins Duncan and Max for another new record, viewed by HRH

2008 First litter in the history of the breed born to two field trial winning parents

2010 Gave evidence to Parliamentary APGAW inquiry into health and breeding of pedigree dogs, criticising the KC and recommending it be denied more powers (more...)

2011 Boris becomes 8th Venaticus Clumber with a trial award: only a “minority breeds” stake C of M, but a start. Bella’s day will come…

2012 Bella and Boris take 1st and 2nd in the WCSS minority breeds field trial

2012 Bella, undefeated in three field trials within a fortnight, achieves the best competition record of any Clumber bitch since 1900

2013 First award for 75 years to a Clumber bitch in an any variety field trial: Bella gains a C of M at Kent Working Spaniel Club novice stake

2014 Boris becomes the 5th Venaticus Clumber to win a field trial

2015 Spot, 15 months old the day before, is victorious in her first field trial: the third bitch in succeeding generations to win a trial

2015 Boris joins his sister Bella as an award winner in an any variety field trial, gaining a second AV C of M a few days later

2015 Spot gains a C of M in a Spaniel Club any variety field trial aged 17 months; with her dam Bella and uncle Boris, these three are the only Clumbers at this time with trial awards against English springers

2016 Spot gains another C of M in an Eastern Counties AV stake, the first Clumber bitch to take two trial awards against springers since 1928

2017 Spot’s litter is the first in the long history of the breed with both parents award winners in AV field trials

2017 Russell becomes the 11th Venaticus Clumber to gain a field trial award

2018 Spot's 2nd place in a Midland Counties AV stake, and her third AV field trial award, are unmatched by a Clumber bitch since 1912

2021 Publication of Rebirth of the Royal Spaniel: The Clumber in the field creates the first book devoted to the breed as a working gundog

Training Insights


How not to have a lumbering Clumber


A series of four articles by James Darley, giving insights into his success with the breed at work and in field trials. Published 1999 – 2000, they remain relevant to trainers and handlers today.


| | |

Why being naughty in class makes a "good boy"


Max listened attentively as I told a class of teenage boys about schooling spaniels and the subtleties of achieving a balance between control and enthusiasm.

“I want a spaniel pup that’s spirited, full of fire, barely under control, really exciting. I want one that’s naughty in class.”

Max, a Clumber spaniel just past his first birthday, rose to the invitation. The two large black paw-prints he promptly placed on my shirt front were a source of some amusement to the boys. I laughed along with them. But he had helped make my point.

James Darley with Clumber pup in meadow

“It’s OK to let him leap up, if that’s what it takes to keep him excited – and to keep him exciting. I can always add more control later. So I don’t slap him down. Better to be dirty with an uplifted dog, than clean with a spaniel that’s repressed. I can wash earth out of the shirt. I can’t put fire into the dog.”

This new angle on adolescent behaviour went down well with the boys, gathered in a semi-circle on a woodland ride within the extensive land holdings of Ampleforth College in North Yorkshire. They were members of Ampleforth’s rough shoot club, an admirably politically incorrect initiative for a leading independent school. While most of the group had gundogs at home, and took an informed interest in training matters during holidays, the club encourages participation in field sports even by boys from non-sporting backgrounds. They learn about keepering and rearing, shoot management and gun safety. Boys in their early years beat on shoot days for the older ones, all under firm but benign supervision. Game is not plentiful and has to be worked for.

Now that Max and I had their full attention, the message I wanted to impart was that in training, tactics can be adapted to serve the long-term strategy. The objective of a fully finished spaniel takes time to develop, and can be reached with tact and guile as well as conditioning.

It is not enough to aim for a dog that is perfectly obedient. The fascination of spaniel work is that it demands a much more elegant solution. The goal is for a dog with all the behaviour and control needed to work him – be it at covert-side, in the beating line, below the tide-line or when rough shooting – but with all his spirits intact, full of initiative and confidence, and capable of acting independently yet in harmony.

At its best, the spaniel and the gun enjoy a remarkable relationship. Not of equals, of course, although a good dog could possibly make as good a fist of shooting as most of us could of game-finding in the worst conditions where spaniels come into their own.

James Darley with Clumbers, Duncan and Beryl

When one reflects on what a spaniel contributes to that partnership, the dog’s job description can seem surprisingly complex. The handler decides when they will go out and where, guides him over the ground being worked, and keeps his manners under check.

All that is easy compared with the spaniel’s part. He employs his pace and his punch to discover and capture game, forcing it to risk escape within sight and range of the gun. Then there are his retrieving skills, over land and water, without which too much of what we shoot (and fail to kill outright) would be lost.

And as well as using his eyes and ears, he practises a magic denied to man, in the scenting power of his nose that we can only wonder at. He can thereby make fine distinctions we may not always fully appreciate. The classic example is a rabbit winded, found and followed in the thick, flushed, shot, wounded and still moving. The sequence, maybe none of it in view of the dog, involves him in a series of decisions, each of them on the cusp of what is required and what is forbidden.

Clumber Spaniel, Hal, hunting

What, then, is the spaniel’s prime task? To hunt, be steady and retrieve. Yes, all these make up its job. But its first purpose is to give pleasure. Efficiency and productivity are very important, but it is style, above all, that we look for. So, what does style mean? What is this quality that counts for so much, especially in field trials where fine distinctions between equally excellent dogs are made? Quite simply, it is what makes working a spaniel such a delight, such a fascination: it is the ability to get the handler’s adrenalin flowing and put a lump in his throat even when the dog is not finding the stuff it is looking for and his barrels remain clean.

Fostering that elusive quality is the prime function of the spaniel’s trainer – just as a good schoolmaster is looking to give his pupil a broad and full education for life, rather than merely to cram him with academic information.

| |

Using the feminine touch to communicate


The boys at Ampleforth College, listening to my lecture on schooling spaniels, had done their homework. They had read about Venaticus Duncan, my best Clumber to date and the breed’s most prolific field trial award winner born in the 20th century. They knew of the Clumber spaniel as a rare, ancient and unlikely-looking working breed, and also as my personal obsession for 25 years. And they knew something of my success with Clumbers. I was keen to explain it.

James Darley with Clumber puppy receiving training on garden lawn

It was not, I began, what I discovered long ago, that a Clumber is outstanding as a picking-up dog. Take one into a pub (where you still can) or other public place, and in no time the prettiest girl there will have her arms around him.

No, no, that was not it at all. I had anyway been banned from using a Clumber for such introductions for as long as I could remember. And you should not be thinking that way about success, lads.

Clumber Spaniel bitch underbelly

Look at Max, I suggested. He’s just 13 months, a big puppy. He’s really promising: see how he looks at me. By nature, the Clumber is inclined to be independent. In practical terms, he’s happy doing his own thing. But self-employment in a spaniel is at odds with our aim of a productive partnership. So the Clumber has to be kept dependent. It is what to look for in selecting a puppy, and it is a quality to be preserved thereafter. It can easily be lost, and by many handlers it is, even through simple errors that may seem unimportant. All it takes is for the habit of eye contact to be weakened, early commands (once learned) to be ignored, the handler to appear less interesting to the pup than playing with litter mates or other dogs, the dog allowed the habit of ranging too far, or exercise to be unaccompanied.

The fundamentals of training a Clumber are no different from other spaniels, but it helps to recognise the characteristics of the breed where they are peculiar. These go beyond its size, shape and appearance. I will have more to say about these in a later part of this series.

For a start, it is essential to appreciate how dogs communicate – and to use their language. It is the same for all forms of effective communication: use the language of the audience.

So, the trainer needs to be transparent, demonstrative and physical in praise, even exaggerated by the standards of human social conventions. This is to separate pleasure from displeasure, which must also be obvious, but restrained, and expressed by voice, dominance and use of the hand – again in dog language. Smacking is a human response. To be a dog, the handler has to stiffen, stare, growl, snarl, scruff and hold-down. I nearly added bite, but do not often own up to that. All this may seem unnatural to inhibited people; and it may look foolish to an observer, but better seem silly now, during a training session, than be made to look stupid when it counts, under fire and the gaze of others on a shoot day.

People talk about dogs as pack animals, and imagine it enough to assume the mantle of pack leader. With young dogs, it is better to replicate the role of the mother of the litter, not the father. This particularly involves the eloquent use of the hands: to begin with they resemble the dam’s pendulous teats, attracting the pup’s attention to mouth the fingers; they then become the equivalent of a dog’s mouth, particularly the dam’s – which tells puppies of her mood and gives grooming, food, play, pleasure,

James Darley with Clumber puppy using hand to emulate teats

warnings and pain. Make pups look to the hands for guidance. For example, raise the palm for dropping and suppressing over-exuberance, easily done when giving an edible treat; raise the whole arm when at any distance. Show the pup when changing direction, point to cover, click to attract attention, clap to demand it. From earliest days, cup hands low when recalling the puppy – he responds to them before ever learning the command. Allow the pup to play bite the fingers.

Gently “bite” him back, particularly his face, around the scruff of the neck for light dominance, harder if he is too rough. Caress his face; wipe his eyes. Hold a biscuit in a closed hand for him to investigate. Use a toggle-less puppy dummy the same way. Later (much later if possible) it is a ready matter to teach heeling, without recourse to a lead, just by having the puppy follow the hand: the advantage here is that if he has not been taught to heel by use of a lead, he never pulls on one when it is introduced.

When to start training is a perennial question. It depends on what is meant by training. Handling in the garden, chasing, playing, adding light controls while feeding and managing around the kennel or indoor cage where the puppy is housed – all is good conditioning. The key is repetition and association.

James Darley with Clumber puppy using hand to emulate dogs' mouth

Serious training, imposing any kind of pressure, is for later, but there really is no need to delay kindergarten lessons as long as they are all paint and play-dough. Unlike other spaniel breeds, with their almost irrepressible sharpness and responsiveness, with the Clumber training cannot afford to wait. If it is delayed, there may be little left on which to build: he can become self-centred, slow, indolent and withdrawn. But if an early programme of structured training is adopted, the need for a light touch is no less, and perhaps more, essential than with any puppy. The aim is to preserve the spirit, the gaiety, the lack of inhibition, the initiative, the fire.

Clumber Spaniel, Bella, on leaves

My Clumbers are not slow. They are no “dogs for old men”. When I exercise a young dog, I am running as much as he is. I keep him going at the double only, and then put him away. His is not the only tongue that is then lolling. People comment on how happy my Clumbers seem. That is part of why they go well, but while the springer is dependent by nature, even the cocker too, the Clumber is not, and it is essential to make him so. The trainer has to be the centre of the dog’s life, the most interesting and surprising being he knows, the inspiration for new experience, the single source of all excitement, pleasure and confidence.

| |

Raising the mood to raise the standard


With other spaniels, the trainer can afford to be tougher, more suppressive when necessary. They have brimstone in reserve. I generalise of course – every dog needs to be treated as an individual. With the Clumber it is harder to achieve the essential, and elusive, balance between fire and water. It is necessary to get the dog’s acceptance of the trainer dominating him, but not being domineering. Few owners seem to achieve the same level of understanding of the Clumber’s character, and few capable trainers of other, easier gundogs make the transition. Not many even make the attempt. Hence the success I have enjoyed with so many Clumbers is rare.

I try to explain to handlers the need to distinguish between training that is elevating, and that which is depressing.

Take the “drop”. If the recall is the first essential control in training, this is the second. But it is depressing, unless it signals another task to follow: then the anticipation makes it uplifting.

Confinement, it might be thought, is depressing. Of course it is, if it is unrelieved. But a confined dog is a dog at ease. It can relax and please itself without being nagged. On release it is fresh and on its toes. Self-restraint on a bed or blanket, perhaps perversely, is repressing: the dog has to stay there, when it would rather be doing things like climbing the furniture, chasing the cat or chewing a toy. It will become used to it, but in doing so may lose the gloss on its performance.

Walking to heel, on or off the lead are out, until such time as they can be associated with the impending prospect of work. Jumping is OK: if the handler needs to discourage it, as he will, he should use the upraised hand, but without being heavy. Naughtiness, I repeat, is good.

Free running and games with the handler, and other dogs, are fine, as long as they take place close, well within what will later become familiar as hunting range: the dog should never get far out without feeling a loss of self-confidence.

Retrieves are uplifting, but they must remain few, and be viewed as a reward, the more so while the dog is too young to correct if he goes wrong. So, picking up and fetching toys is allowed, collecting rubbish and dead things, however unspeakable, is a yes: smile and say thank you, even through gritted teeth.

Steadiness does not need to be depressing, if it is introduced as fun – prompted by hand signals, a word of command, the whistle, the thrown dummy (and later a shot) – all with the element of surprise. And sparingly. And followed by more of what the dog is learning to love best – free running, never mind the cover, with wonderful animal scents to intoxicate him. And in spite of the boss dodging and weaving back and forth in a daft zigzag pattern: oh well, might as well humour him and follow his lead.

It is important that the dog does not know he is being trained. Then he cannot react against it. Commands are part of his routine, not of lessons. Reinforcement comes from the association of commands with events, from play, and from a sense of dependence. If the pup is becoming too cocky on familiar ground, move on to new ground where he will be more dependent.

Early training of a Clumber pup enables the handler to have, at maybe only six months, a lively, responsive, dependent, well-mannered but mischievous infant, ready and keen for his first day at school. And to know he’ll do well.

Schooling in the subjects he will need can then become a little more serious, more applied. It should involve no sudden change in tempo.

Remembering the discussion about uplifting and depressing activity, minimum schooling is desirable. Three times a week when you are both fresh and eager is preferable to twice a day as a necessary chore.

The lead when accepted is uplifting for short periods, as the dog can switch off, quietly anticipating release and action; for longer, such as when waiting a turn at a novice test, say, the lead is a restraint and can be depressing, which may explain an uncharacteristically poor performance that confounds his owner.

Hunting is uplifting when free, but intervening to persuade the dog to hunt a close, shallow pattern, invariably necessary with a Clumber, can be depressing, so care is needed. Equally, hunting when tired is a downer, so keep sessions short and sharp. Cover that hurts, like brambles, gorse, thistles and stinging nettles, is not uplifting until it too is recognised by the dog as where game is to be found.

Dropping can be depressing, particularly on a damp backside, and shots at first – unless these controls can be associated with heralding other actions; these should not, of course, be assumed each time to be retrieves, or steadiness will suffer. The norm should be to hunt on. Accurate guns may have to do some deliberate missing if the dog is not to learn to expect there is game to collect after every shot.

Steadiness needs to be a positive alteration of the instinct to chase. This is easier advised than practised. So the dog needs incentives. This could be a few moments of pure, concentrated, eye-to-eye and mind-to-mind contact to cement the action. It could be clear – even exaggerated – praise, but followed by a call to attention else riot may result. It could be a game as reward, a retrieve, or more hunting to follow.

The closer the Clumber is to the point of breaking his bonds of control, the quicker his mind is working, the sharper his wits, the more receptive he is and the quicker his responses. It may be a contradiction but he can be at his most steady, then, on the verge of unsteadiness. At that edge, he is really living. He is at his most exciting and, for the handler who loves spaniel work, his most stylish.

| |

Clumbers as spaniels: same job, different approach


While the Clumber is a spaniel, and fulfils exactly the same demands as other spaniels, he has peculiarities in his work. And while a good working Clumber is by definition a highly distinctive shooting companion, these differences go beyond the obvious of size, build and colour.

He is inclined to dwell on scent. When he does so, the handler may need to hurry him or himself run. Lining and boring-on are not unusual traits. Teach “No” on animal runs. One particular bloodline was notorious for dogs accelerating away and then hunting with great style – at a distance of three gunshots. In Sweden, which has more Clumbers than any country after the UK and the US, the breed is expected to follow the blood trails of deer, as well as to hunt for game. It is asking much from the same dog, too much, as I found when judging a field trial and dogs were hunting in straight lines ahead.

The dog must learn when he is at the limit of comfortable range, by being dropped or turned. If he is hunting in straight lines, the handler should turn and run. Hunting training should generally be in long grass or light cover, not in the bare open. A big sky and wide horizons can be a lure to running bigger.

Hunting of a pattern seems less natural than with a springer or cocker. But with a Clumber that is relating willingly to the handler, it is readily introduced. The handler needs to be active. He may take as much exercise quartering the ground as the dog. He may look crazy to an onlooker. But he is giving the dog the lead, the direction, making him responsive to body and hand movements.

Clumber Spaniel close up profile

It is helpful to understand that the Clumber’s nose is his dominant force. It is large and pink and you will soon come to respect it.

Where other breeds cover their ground by a mix of pace, pattern and penetration, as well as scent, the Clumber relies more on what his conk tells him. Head carriage is typically low as he is working ground scent more than air. The need to preserve voluntary eye contact is thereby obvious, as part of the overall need to keep the dog dependent.

Thus, the Clumber needs scent to inform and motivate his hunting, unlike those spaniels it is said will quarter up the M1 motorway. So the trainer should not expect great shakes in a recreation ground, or a bed of nasty cover devoid of game, nor in hot and dry or still and humid conditions.

A tendency to slow as scent intensifies and to hesitate before flushing may give the gun time to approach, but it also may allow game to escape or flush out of range. The dog should anyway be within the gun’s comfortable range, and chivvying the dog to move on is an abomination. Handlers should not make excuses for the breed on this score, but instead give dogs under training every encouragement to hunt hard, accelerate on hot scent and flush aggressively.

Clumber Spaniel on a snowy bank looking up, black and white

Marking is often not good – and the trainer may need to teach this skill by, for instance, using dummies, releasing homing pigeons, shooting woodpigeons at flight, even adding a verbal “Mark” when game or songbirds are flushed.

For anything more than a short sprint, the Clumber is not so quick on his feet as more volatile breeds, but he need not be slow if the trainer takes to heart the advice to go only at the double and to keep him excited.

He is prone to be stubborn, but will be less so if dependent, if the handler is honest and trusting and

thinking like the dog, anticipating. He is also inclined to be introverted – and needs tact, joy, play and success.

I have yet to come across a Clumber that is not a natural retriever. I have encountered many with retrieving problems, but these were all made by handling errors, whether of commission or omission.

On the other hand, I have yet to meet a Clumber that has never tenderised game, even if only in the excitement of youth or with the first bird of the day or the season. Hard mouth is a danger, but less so with the confident dog accustomed to racing back for effusive praise and more work – the dog developed through the techniques described in this series of articles. Use of a command “Gently”, introduced early to encourage a well-mannered acceptance of biscuits, can be helpful. Carrying is always to be allowed. If he is rough with his work, the object carried can become a wire brush, a bird studded with cocktail sticks, or simply more game and not less.

Clumbers need more uplifting experiences, and fewer depressing ones, than other spaniels. By their nature, they have further to be uplifted to be stylish. Equally, they have a shorter distance to fall to be depressed.

If the balance is right there is no more rewarding experience for the handler, and for fellow guns, than to shoot over a working Clumber under full steam. Train a Clumber fit for the field, let alone for field trials, and not only will the handler have gained an experience that is still rare, he will have attained a level of insight and competence such that training any other breed can seem a breeze.

Clumber Spaniel, Ros, at Pond Farm
| |

Campaigns


Early attempts at reform


A solo effort to reform the breed club, the Clumber Spaniel Club, began soon after James Darley became a member in the late 1970s. As the solitary member devoted to the Clumber as a working gundog, he quickly perceived how the club, dedicated as it was to the show ring, was wedded to the prevailing show type – oversized, exaggerated, bolshie and unsound, particularly in hips and eyes – all characteristics at odds with the requirements for the field. While breeding for the show ring, leading members were selling stock to owners wanting to work them, with claims that “Of course they work”. To the extent that working owners had no alternative source, this was true, but their needs were not represented at all in the type perpetrated.

James Darley made himself an unpopular figure, writing articles and addressing annual general meetings on the subject of health and the enduring qualities of the breed that were being ignored in a blinkered quest for glory in

dog shows. Showing, of course, disregards any characteristics beyond the superficial other than movement. In Clumbers, this was defined in the KC breed standard as “a rolling gait”, and given the size of most specimens that were favoured by judges (many of them exhibitors themselves of course), this might just as well have been “roly-poly gait”.

In the end, it proved impossible to persuade the club to do more than pay lip service to practical gundog work and its demands of the breed. Soon after Shaun Freke and James Darley set up a working section, interference by the club’s establishment amounting to sabotage forced them to determine that the breed’s revival, its true needs and those of working owners could only be served by a new organisation, and in 1984 the Working Clumber Spaniel Society (WCSS) was set up.

It has not looked back. In the period since, the breed club has become more dual purpose, and should be credited for that. There are also encouraging signs at last that the show type animal is beginning to be less extreme: while mature specimens display the damage done to the breed by a focus on the show ring, and remain largely unchanged in terms of size, exaggeration and impracticality, many of the younger examples give hope that soundness, function and fitness are getting the priority they deserve. The influence of the demands of the field is welcome, adding to the improvement in the breed's mean hip status which has come almost entirely from working lines.

As early as 1993 the WCSS had already achieved so much, and had proved so influential in every measure of improvement, that James Darley was able to give a presentation that year on the society's role to an international symposium in Sweden on the future and health of the Clumber spaniel.

Hip scoring in Clumber spaniels


In the early 1980s, James Darley, concerned about the evident problems of over-large dogs and hip dysplasia (erosion of the ball and socket joint) in Clumber spaniels, attempted to persuade the breed club, the Clumber Spaniel Club, to take a position in reducing weights and combating a condition which caused pain and disability in individual dogs, and led to euthanasia in extreme cases. Breeders were neither taking active steps to tackle hip dysplasia (HD), nor warning buyers of puppies about its prevalence. The show ring was the primary interest of the club’s members, and that arena placed minimal strain on a dog although good movement is one of the criteria judged. In the field, freedom from arthritic damage is obviously vital if a working dog is to lead a long and active life and repay the investment in its training, while extra weight saps energy and stamina.

Prior to the club’s AGM in the spring of 1982, where he proposed to speak, James Darley asked the leading canine geneticist, Dr Malcolm Willis of Newcastle

University, to write a paper responding to the proposals the Kennel Club had at that time, influenced by breeders of over-sized show Clumbers, to revise the breed standard to encourage higher weights. The Kennel Club had already raised the weights in three previous revisions of the standard during the 20th century. What it proposed effectively doubled the breed’s size from what it was in the early 1900s, when Clumber spaniels were highly regarded as working gundogs and pre-eminent in field trials.

The paper Dr Willis wrote was presented at the AGM and, perhaps inevitably, rejected. “What does he know about Clumbers?” was one comment. So the breed club did not want to know. Nor did the Kennel Club, which in due course, defying the expert advice of Dr Willis and the robust recommendations of the newly-formed Working Clumber Spaniel Society, introduced its new breed standard, with greatly increased weight definitions.

Meantime, James Darley arranged with Dr Willis to extend his recording and analysis of the hip scoring scheme, pioneered in German shepherd dogs, to Clumbers. Early results showed that the breed had the worst average score (44) of any breed of dog. The Kennel Club showed no interest in the scheme until, many years later, with health issues in pedigree dogs starting to become a risk to reputation, it adopted the identical model as the KC/BVA scheme. After more than 750 Clumbers had their hips scored, the breed average, which had obstinately remained over 40 for two decades, reached 35 by the end of 2010. In the same period, the typical hip scores of Clumbers of working bloodlines had dropped to single figures or low doubles, and there had even been two specimens with zero scores. This demonstrates that it is working Clumbers that have brought the breed average down, with typical hip scores totalling high single figures or low doubles.

The creation of the Working Clumber Spaniel Society


The movement to restore the largest breed of native spaniel was transformed from the passion of a handful of individuals by the creation of the society. Since 1984 it has been bringing a brave new world to this old working breed. Its aims – and soon its achievements – were to offer sportsmen the kind of Clumber our great grandfathers respected, the dog that dominated early field trials more than a century ago.

A dog radically different from today’s typical show animal. Maybe half its weight. Bred to be free from worthless exaggerations: from eye troubles you can see; from hip and other problems you can’t. A sharper dog, spirited, responsive, kind and keen to please.

An unlikely-looking working spaniel, that’s true, even when solidly purpose-bred for many generations. But one with drive, its own style, and a nose on which reputations are made. A healthy, efficient, valued game finder – for those not afraid to be noticed. Fired-up and fulfilling its traditional role as a beating or all round hunting-retrieving spaniel, a dog as indispensable to its master or mistress as it is unforgettable for their companions.

Once more a gundog in more than name alone, the Clumber is benefiting from the safe hands and sure voice of shooting people working to enrich their days with a rare breed that is physically and functionally sound, and can prove it.

The society is the forum for the expression and exchange of views of working Clumber owners, world-wide. It is the focus for interest in the breed and has attracted much attention from sporting and general news media in the UK and around the world. And, through its programme and influence, it is the force behind the breed’s revival as a genuine gundog bred to be fit for the field.

James Darley was responsible for the society’s original objects, positioning, financial strength and communications, and served as its secretary for the first 12 years.

He reported on its role, and the successes and influence achieved in its first ten years, to an international symposium in Sweden in 1993.

The Kennel Club as hindrance


For the organisation that loudly claims its primary objective is “to promote in every way, the general improvement of dogs”, the Kennel Club has some funny ways of showing it.

For instance:

• The KC originally declined to register the WCSS until bowing to the inevitable after a long delay when it was made apparent that legal action was being considered.

• The KC declined to accept the WCSS’s constitutional objects until modified to remove its overt distancing from the breed standard.

• The KC brought in a new breed standard in 1986, greatly increasing weight, in spite of the WCSS’s stated opposition and the evidence of the UK’s leading canine geneticist that it would cause damage. This was the fourth increase in weight in the breed standard in less than a century, each change made at the behest of the show fraternity, and each disadvantaging the breed in terms of health and function.

• The KC originally opposed the introduction of the hip scoring scheme, which was developed by the German Shepherd Dog League, then adopted by the WCSS with the support of the British Veterinary Association, and only later co-sponsored with the BVA by the KC.

• The KC broke its own rules by an arbitrary decision, without consultation, to omit awards, gained at the kind of field trials primarily featuring Clumber spaniels, from the Stud Book, the annual official record, which motivates owners to compete for recognition and provides an independent source of data for would-be breeders.

• The KC again took an arbitrary decision, albeit with considerable opposition from the working spaniel community alerted to the implications by the WCSS, to alter the rules of Open stake trials attracting all spaniel breeds, restricting them to English springers, thereby removing the opportunity of higher levels of competition from the owners of Clumber and other minority breed spaniels and disincentivising them in their aspirations. It took 14 years before this was put right.

Although the KC allows dog clubs no other body to represent them, imposes rules on them to agree to this, and restricts the abilities of clubs and individuals to participate in activities it has not sanctioned (and charged fees for), the Office of Fair Trading and parliamentarians seem unable to see beyond its status as a member organisation. It has been pointed out to them that the only members of the KC are a few hundred people who have served their time and kept their noses clean long enough to be allowed to put their muzzles in the communal feed bowl. They enjoy fine dining and other London club privileges which effectively make the organisation resistant to change and keen to preserve an unregulated flow of revenue that allows the few to be subsidised by the many (the owners of seven million dogs in the UK). Until someone wakes up to the abuse of the monopoly permitted to the KC, the situation is unlikely to improve.

The Stud Book issue


Early in 2000 James Darley discovered during a visit to the Kennel Club’s library that “minor breeds” trials and the awards gained in them had ceased to be recorded in the Stud Book after the 1998 edition (covering the 1997-98 season). A KC official confirmed that the recipients of such awards were no longer receiving a Stud Book number.

This unprecedented discrimination, motivated it seems largely out of resentment in the KC’s corridors and committee rooms at the media attention gained by those undeserving upstarts with Clumber and other minority breed spaniels, posed a significant handicap to the movement to improve these breeds in the field by impoverishing the journal of record to publish only show awards and by denying field trial award winners any recognition of hard-won achievements vital to an objective demonstration of working quality.

As a campaign mounted to object to the move, led by James Darley on behalf of all four minority breeds, a “concession” was made by the KC in 2001 whereby winners of a first place would qualify for inclusion. It did not seem to occur to the KC to work out how to record a first place for a field trial that itself was not recorded! Neither of these steps had been taken with any prior consultation.

The issues raised and their implications were described by James Darley in a letter published by Country Illustrated, November 2001.

As the campaign continued, James Darley was able to show the KC that its intentions were flawed, the changes made were disallowed by its own rules and (using research of the Stud Book itself) that its arguments were baseless. A letter went to 60 members of the KC Field Trial Liaison Council (representing 115 field trial societies) to brief them and ask for their support in restoring the pre-1998 status quo. At its meeting in May 2002, with just two objections, the council overwhelmingly did just that.

A meeting of invited delegates followed at the Kennel Club in August. Sensing that it was looking for a face-saving formula short of the Liaison Council’s resolution, James Darley firstly put on record his intention to make a formal complaint about the KC, its committees and members, to its own disciplinary process; he secondly rejected, on pain of leaving immediately, the request from the chairman for the meeting to be subject to rules of confidentiality.

The happy outcome was a notification from the KC in November 2002 that all its changes were to be reversed, all missing Stud Book content would be published as an erratum together with an explanation. After three years and a huge distraction in terms of time and effort, all aims had been achieved.

The "any variety" issue


It was not long before the Kennel Club, while attempting to justify itself as acting from “a genuine wish to assist”, had its retaliation. Again, without a word of the consultation it had previously promised would accompany future proposed changes, and timed to bypass the meeting of the Field Trial Liaison Council which the year before had rejected the KC’s alteration to Stud Book entry and insisted all spaniel breeds be treated equally, it decided to restrict any variety Open stake field trials to English springers only.

In its genuine wish to assist the minority breeds, it closed the door for these breeds to compete at the highest level, creating a disincentive for able and experienced handlers to adopt them.

James Darley wrote numerous letters and briefings, for the WCSS and on his own behalf. As a summary of the main arguments, the letter published in The Field, July 2003, serves as a record.

The bias and lack of logic in this discriminatory decision was eventually exposed when a Clumber in the hands of a professional trainer won an any variety Novice field trial. It was manifestly unfair that this dog should be barred by virtue of its breed from going further, so after 14 years the Kennel Club changed the rules again to allow Clumbers into Open stakes for English springer spaniels. The next season the same dog took an award at the higher level.

Breed standards and welfare issue


When BBC television aired a documentary on the breeding and health of pedigree dogs in August 2008, implicating the Kennel Club as colluding in the serious deficiencies it highlighted, the whole issue rapidly escalated into a national scandal. Given the consistent record of the Working Clumber Spaniel Society in challenging the Kennel Club over the breed standard, and the improvements in health achieved in the working lines, the society had a great opportunity to reinforce its positioning as the guardian and champion of the breed.

James Darley was no longer on the committee, but prepared a strategy with fully elaborated tactics and texts for the society to use. Unfortunately, the committee failed to appreciate the advantage to be gained, and failed to adopt any of the recommendations. In that vacuum, James himself picked up the baton, briefing journalists, the BASC and the Secretary of State’s special adviser at DEFRA, writing articles and letters for publication, and providing written and later verbal evidence to the Associate Parliamentary Group for Animal Welfare.